2 min read. The family of the dog euthanized by PETA last year is suing the animal rights group for up to $9 million, according to court paperwork filed in Norfolk. This case was the first in history that sought to apply the 13 th Amendment to other animals. PETA claimed that the injunction violated its right to freedom of expression, which is protected by Article . Bernards told Rolo to say hi, which Carr took as an invitation to pet the dog. The courts found this depiction to be unacceptable under German law, which is constructed around the protection of human dignity. As courts previously ruled, the First Amendment protects investigative reporting. That includes authors such as Lincoln Steffens and Upton Sinclair[, who] exposed widespread corruption and abuse in American life. 365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4. So mark your calendars: That day that will go down in history as the first time that a U.S. court considers constitutional rights for animals. This effectively gave copyright ownership to Slater.[6]. Follow him on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil. In 1996, PETA requested that Doughney voluntarily transfer the domain name, because it owned the trademark PETA though it had not yet used the acronym as a domain name. However, the court determined that the state could not legally seize the truck and money because Sergeant Ricard had illegally extended the stop to allow Scooby to sniff the vehicle.[2]. I find that there is a greater validity to the suit as against PETA. PETA brought a suit against Slater and a self-publishing book company in 2015, . Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox! Ignore the Kindle Unlimited language and click under it where it says $0.00 to buy.). The underlying material facts of this case are well known and are reported in detail in PETA v. . 2008) (videos depicting cruelty to animals as free speech) Text Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Cmtys. By order dated May 29, 1996, the district court awarded PETA $228,625.48 and PAWS $6589.91 in costs. Of course, SeaWorld wants the case to be dismissed, but on January 13, our legal team filed a briefopposing SeaWorlds motion, and the case will be argued on February 6, 2012. PETA says its euthanasia rate is partly the result of accepting animals that other shelters decline. Judge Flammer threw the case out, saying the that court could not charge monkeys. From . WASHINGTON The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), and the Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a lawsuit today seeking to stop the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from unconstitutionally blocking comments containing keywords associated with viewpoints critical of . Filed on August 17, the . Sign up for Verge Deals to get deals on products we've tested sent to your inbox daily. Thus the trademark infringement claim centered on whether the "defendant used the mark 'in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising' of goods or services". However, he failed to receive the order when a court determined that Koch and Missing had done nothing wrong and could tweet about Hofmeyr. However, a judge threw the case out because horses cannot sue their owners, or anybody for that matter. [7] This was seen by the court as his attempt to profit from the peta.org domain name. In cases like that, the law allows a third party to sue on their behalf as a next friend provided, of course, theres a suitably close relationship. However, Carrs attorney, Brian Hefner, noted that surveillance footage shows that Carr only touched the dogs head and ear. I want to thank others who stand up to PETA. Daleiden deserves accolades, not a court judgment ordering him to pay $15.8 million to the very people whose horrific treatment of aborted babies he worked to expose. The police sent a dog after McQuery after he refused orders to stop. It requested $100,000 in damages. Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. . Theyre glad the case has been settled.. 10 Musician Loses Court Battle Against Puppet. On January 17, 2021, the district court issued an order denying Defendants motion to dismiss the case. Gwinnet County tried to have the lawsuit dismissed, but a federal judge rejected this, so the county appealed. The court ruled the horse could not file the lawsuit because otherwise, courts would soon be filled with animals suing their owners. They have since carried their lawsuit over to Haddix, despite the fact that the concerns they had about Casey no longer applied. PETA said it will pay the family $49,000 and donate $2,000 to a local SPCA to honour Maya. Fourth and finally, it led me to Ralph. But now the case has completed collapsed as PETA has dismissed the lawsuit against the rest of the defendants, spending tens of thousands of dollars of donor funds on attorneys, including one of the largest and most expensive law firms in the country, that achieved exactly nothing. The ruling became an early precedent on the nature of domain names as . PETA claimed Slater was profiting unfairly off of the artistic . The groups highlighted the importance of undercover reporting. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has agreed to hear PETA's lawsuit against the state's Department of Agricultural Resources, after the department refused to release information that's contained in public records under the Massachusetts Public Records Law.. PETA filed its Massachusetts' Public Records Law request in 2014, asking the department for the records of the importation . Summary. In turn, people have been sued by animals and nonhuman objects. On August 17, 2021, the ACLU and Cockey, Brennan & Maloney, P.C. According to wildlife photographer David Slater, he had left some of his equipment on the jungle floor, and the monkey had grabbed the camera and taken a selfie. The officers turned down her request because monkeys are wild animals and cannot be charged. Its likely that PETA tried to settle the lawsuit before a decision was reached in order to avoid a ruling that might make it harder for them to bring future lawsuits. PETA's landmark lawsuit against SeaWorld in behalf of wild-captured orcas is the most groundbreaking legal case for animals ever to reach the courts. Sergeant Christopher Ricard of the Geary County Sheriffs Department stopped the truck over a partially obscured traffic plate. Draco bit Jones, sending him falling into a ravine. Their testimony was used for a series of articles and ultimately became Why PETA Kills. National Meat Ass'n v. Harris, 565 U.S. 452 (2012) (FMIA expressly preempts California state law pertaining to slaughterhouses.) For now, the law allows the mother to abort the baby without any consideration from the father. It also suffered from frostbite. The monkeys scratched her with their paws, pulled at her clothes and hair, and removed her bikini top. In 2018, the state of Kansas lost a lawsuit against a Toyota pickup truck. However, Jimmy turned violent and bit Ms. Sheas finger when she playfully attempted to retrieve the candy. While PETA sued others directly, suing me in such a manner would be dangerous for them. Wilber Zarate had sued PETA for taking his daughters Chihuahua from a mobile home park on the states Eastern Shore and putting it down before the end of a required five-day grace period. He demanded $7 million in compensation. [3] Doughney appealed this decision to the Fourth Circuit. Advertisement - story continues below. As many of you already know, in 2017, PETA filed a lawsuit against several reporters and critics of their killing. The agreement was confirmed Wednesday by PETA and the familys attorney. Out of 760 dogs impounded, they killed 713, arranged for 19 to be adopted, and farmed out 36 to other shelters (not necessarily "no kill" ones). Perhaps you should, like, exit immediately" and provided a link to the official People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) website,[2] which due to Doughney's action had to use a less intuitive domain name. PETA's involvement may seem surprising, but the animal-rights groups rightly warn that the district court's $15.8 million ruling against Daleiden endangers the freedom of speech. "PETA was eager to prove in court that chasing and . He added that the officer told the dog, Eat him up, eat him up., McQuery later claimed he made a mistake by naming the dog as a defendant. The complaint alleges that Shore Transits policy violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments because it is incapable of reasoned application by Shore Transits officials, viewpoint discriminatory against speech that Shore Transit deems offensive, and inherently vague. Afr., Hoho v. S, Case No . He is the author of Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. 4. For obvious reasons, I am glad it was me and not PETA reps who saw him in the gutter on the way to the courthouse. On 09/22/2010 Citibank NA Plaintiff filed a Contract - Debt Collection lawsuit against Peta Innerarity Defendant. Salinas, Calif. - PETA has filed a notice in Monterey County Superior Court to appeal a court decision dismissing PETA's lawsuit against the Monterey Zoo and its president, Charlie Sammut, a case involving the use of canes to threaten and control the elephants it exploits. Magers said he filed the lawsuit because he wants the law to protect fathers of unborn children. The Ninth Circuit concluded that the Copyright Act does not clearly state that animals can sue. The dispute arose when PETA sued Slater in 2015 - doing so, they claim, on behalf of the monkey. Why is the Ninth Circuit so mad at PETA? However, in making this ruling with respect to . If you are a Home delivery print subscriber, unlimited online access is. Aside from being cruel, the claims are also dishonest. Why is the monkeys name Naruto? The plaintiffs in the case, Tilikum, Katina, Kasatka, Ulises, and Corky, were captured and taken from their ocean homes and families and are confined to the equivalent of concrete bathtubs, where they are forced to earn money for SeaWorld by performing for customers entertainment. The Animal Legal Defense Fund did on its behalf. Animal-rights . U.S. only. In 1995, Michael Doughney registered the domain name peta.org for his website titled "People Eating Tasty Animals". The shelter routinely dispatches veterinarians to care for local animals but is also euthanizes ones that PETA deems too sick, aggressive or feral for adoption. A cite to Cetacean v. Bush and a quick analysis of the Copyright Act should take up about three paragraphs, but the decision runs about fifteen pages, with an even longer concurrence. The ruling is a victory for an animal-rights group in one of several legal actions against the zoo owner who appeared in . However, the Animal Legal Defense Fund filed the lawsuit because Justice could need money for further treatment. They are best known for their frequent inflammatory and downright irresponsible media stunts, such as throwing red paint or fake blood on people . Current subscribers: You will continue to receive e-mail unless you explicitly opt out by clicking, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. 2012)) was a legal case heard in the US Federal Court in 2012 concerning the constitutional standing of an orca.It was brought by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) on behalf of Tilikum, an orca kept in the SeaWorld Orlando park, against the SeaWorld corporation. Trouble began for Jimmy when Mr. Dillio took him to Ms. Sheas shop. This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Consistent with overwhelming evidence already available, such testimony would likely be damning, and PETA knows it. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) claimed that Naruto owned the copyright to the picture. The ruling became an early precedent on the nature of domain names as both trademarked intellectual property and free speech. PETA lost case against Amul. Naruto, a crested macaque monkey in Indonesia, has no rights to the (adorable) selfies he took on a nature photographer's camera, according to the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. [2], Doughney claimed that his peta.org website was a parody of the PETA organization, and was free speech permissible under the First Amendment. Deputy Bernards claimed that Carr was bitten because he wrapped his hands around the dogs snout. Apr 24, 2018. ), and zoos while promoting a vegan diet. Okay, So It Looks as if the Justice Department Probably Has Spies in Catholic Churches, FRIDAY AT 3PM EASTERN: 'Five O'Clock Somewhere' with Kruiser, VodkaPundit, Special Guest KDJ - Replay Available, California - Do Not Sell My Personal Information. Before and during the litigation, Doughney made statements suggesting that PETA should "settle" with him and "make him an offer" for the domain name. They also know I would never settle, nor agree to a dismissal. PETAs baseless, legally inept, scare tactic masquerading as a lawsuit was dismissed without any concessions. PETA is mostly known for campaigns against factory farming and animal testing, often exposing unsavoury practices through undercover operations. They have also been turned into virtual breeding machines in order to provide more performers for SeaWorlds cruel shows. Access all of our expanded, online-only, subscriber exclusive opinion writing. The lawsuit is an attempt to "Free Lolita," the killer whale which the seaquarium has housed since 1970. v. Center for Medical Progress, et al. In the amicus brief, PETA joined with Animal Outlook, Mercy For Animals, Inc. (MFA), and the Government Accountability Project (GAP). This panel disagreed, but said it was bound by the precedent of Cetacean until the case was overruled by a higher court implicitly calling for a higher court (like a Ninth Circuit en banc panel or the Supreme Court) to go back and make it much harder for PETA to sue for animal rights. How could a monkey sue for copyright? The Thomas More Society is defending Daleiden in five different legal cases. Did You Ever Wonder How and Why the Left Is Able to Push Their Narratives Almost Unhindered? In just one year, PETA rescued 39 tigers from decrepit conditions, and two more, Luna and Remington, went to their new home at an accredited sanctuary this past January. The use of deception for undercover investigative reporting on matters of public concern is constitutionally protected speech. Can monkeys even own copyright? A close-up photo of a Sulawesi crested macaque grinning boldly at the camera went viral on the internet in 2011. And elsewhere, PETA just lost a (legitimate) case in a Florida court. The court also granted Slater attorneys fees on appeal, meaning PETA will have to pay for the photographers lawyer. Officers found McQuery in the neighborhood. Besides Smoky, there was another bear I spent a lot of time . For the past several days, I have been posting stories of our movements success, including groundbreaking accomplishments in 2019 and groundbreaking developments for the year to come. Please try again, Zarate had alleged that PETA operates under a broad policy of euthanizing animals, including healthy ones, because it considers pet ownership to be a form of involuntary bondage., PETA denied the allegations and maintains the 2014 incident was a terrible mistake.. These New Vegan Cookbooks Will Inspire You to Save Animals Every Day of the Year. I want to thank the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and the Press Freedom Defense Fund for taking it on. For some reason, his getaway vehicle was Ballards wheelchair, which traveled at a pitiable 3.2 kilometers per hour (2 mph). A former police officer sued PETA, claiming the group violated a confidentiality agreement. Justice was hungry, thirsty, and underweight by 136 kilograms (300 lb) at the time it was rescued. Meanwhile, Doughney claimed that his website was a parody, which was an act of free speech and which should absolve him of the trademark infringement allegation. Jones didnt and started to run. PETAs brief cites more than 200 years of U.S. Supreme Court precedent, including such landmark cases as Dred Scott, Brown v. Board of Education, and Loving, to establish that the orcas species does not deny them the right to be free under the 13th Amendment and that long-established prejudice does not determine constitutional rights. In addition to ruling against PETA, the court remanded the case for a determination of appellate stage attorneys' fees and costs that would be owed to the appellees. However, the most popular was a selfie taken by a monkey that pressed on the shutter. This case was filed in Broward County Circuit Courts, Broward County Central Courthouse located in Broward, Florida. The organization said it helps as many as 25,000 animals a year, spaying and neutering many for free. Harvard law professor and constitutional scholar Laurence H. Tribe said, People may well look back on this lawsuit and see in it a perceptive glimpse into a future of greater compassion for species other than our own.. The next issue of NP Posted will soon be in your inbox. Shea offered Jimmy a piece of candy, which he accepted while chattering in appreciation. On April 23, 2015, 55-year-old Stanley McQuery broke into the Hillcrest, San Diego, home of 79-year-old William Ballard. A US appeals court ruled Monday that US copyright law doesn't allow animals to file . There is an interesting lawsuit filed in Washington against the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) over censorship. If you want to learn the how, what, where, when, and why, Why PETA Kills is available for free download on Amazon through Friday. The case is a First and Fourteenth Amendment challenge to Shore Transit . "Today, the court reaffirmed that nonhuman animals have the constitutional . When two of the named defendants filed a motion with the court to compel PETA to provide information under oath, PETA, as predicted, cut and run. Houston, TexasThe Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) sued Texas A&M University on behalf of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) for blocking comments on its official Facebook page that mention PETA by name or use certain words to criticize the university's use of dogs in muscular dystrophy experiments. But I had the law on my side. In a test case, the organisation has filed 14 charges against Tasracing and an Australian jockey for using a whip according to racing standards in two races at Mowbray in Launceston in 2019. In 2016, then-California Attorney GeneralKamala Harris, now Bidens vice president, directed her office to search Daleidens home,seizing his video footageand preparing a legal case against him. Nonliving objects and animals are not always safe from litigation. Michael Zhang. However, Rolo bit Carr in the abdomen when Carr touched the canines ear and head. There was an error, please provide a valid email address. David Perle 202-483-7382. Shore Transit rejected the advertisements, stating that they were too offensive for the transit systems advertising market and political in nature, in violation of Shore Transits advertising policy. Our EIN number is 94-2681680. Over the years, people have sued animals and even inanimate objects like puppets. The case worked its way to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, where the court framed the issue this way: . Animal-rights activists know the name PETA is an acronym for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. However, he impounded it when Scooby, his police dog, sniffed out 11.9 grams of marijuana hidden inside the vehicle. Unfortunately, PETAs actions could be the new normal under todays holding, Smith wrote dourly. The court found it unnecessary to review the content of Doughney's site and only considered his use of the domain name. And it allows the Zarates to bring some closure to a very painful chapter of their lives. The District Court ruled against PETA on precisely this ground. The attorneys general, pro-life groups, and animal rights groups like PETA are right to warn that this horrific verdict will chill undercover journalism. PETA allegedly disagreed . PETA's earliest efforts focused on legal challenges to animal treatment in the U.S., but they have since broadened their mission to include multi-pronged outreach efforts. The zoo has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the lower courts' rulings based on the argument that PETA lacked standing to sue. 2d 915, 2000 U.S. Dist. A startled, embarrassed, and angry Ms. Hart reported the incident to the police and tried to file charges against the monkeys. [2], Last edited on 17 February 2023, at 16:46, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Bucci, https://cyber.harvard.edu/stjohns/PETA_v_Doughney.html, "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Doughney", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People_for_the_Ethical_Treatment_of_Animals_v._Doughney&oldid=1139940161, 113 F. Supp. According to the court, the complaint plausibly alleges that the criteria contained in Defendants policy are insufficient to ensure principled, consistent application; that the policys prohibition against advertisements are controversial, offensive, objectionable, or in poor taste discriminates against viewpoints that Shore Transit deems offensive; that PETAs advertisements were indeed rejected for viewpoint discriminatory reasons; and that Defendants prohibitions are vague., ACLU Sues Maryland Transit System for Banning Ads from PETA, Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Attachment 1 - Briana Vazquez Declaration, Attachment 2 - Robin R. Cockey Declaration, Exhibit A - PETA Maryland Public Information Act (MPIA) Request, Exhibit B - Tri-County Counsel Response to PETA MPIA Request, Exhibit D - Vector Media Contract & Maryland Locally Operated Transit System Manual, Exhibit E - TCC Executive Board Meeting Minutes, Exhibit F - Vector Media Advertising Reports, Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Support our on-going litigation and work in the courts. When an individual is removed from his or her home by force, imprisoned, made to work, and forever denied their freedom, its called slavery. In October 2011, PETA filed a lawsuit against SeaWorldin behalf of five wild-captured orcas seeking a declaration that thesefive orcas are slaves and subjected to involuntary servitude in violation of the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. v. Sea World Parks & Entertainment Inc., 842 F. Supp. The Court denied PETAs motion, a victory for animals, investigative journalism, the First Amendment, and breaking ground by extending those protections to new/non-traditional media, such as bloggers. But it also runs a shelter at its headquarters in . Second, to the extent, as the district court acknowledged, added security costs stem from public anger over the revealed conduct, these alleged harms are inseparable from the publics response to the published information (underscoring that this is a matter of public concern). Indeed, Sinclair and Nader took their advocacy onto the campaign trail and sought public office. If you saw those animals, there would be nothing controversial about it., From a tailored suit to hair wax to keep his coif in place, Don't miss this deal on Microsoft Office's full suite of applications and tools, Best Buy, Fable and DAVIDsTEA, to name a few. [2], The court held that the domain name "peta.org" implied ownership by the organization, and thus did not qualify as a parody. Americans United for Life, Live Action,Project Veritas and Project Veritas Action, and Judicial Watchalso filed briefs supporting Daleiden. Under Cetacean, monkey can see but monkey cant sue. Covance disputed the charges and filed a lawsuit against PETA protesting Leitten's covert and deceptive actions. I refused. Update, April 24th 9:20AM PT: The article previously referred to Judge Smiths opinion as a dissent, rather than a concurrence, and has now been corrected. In 2015, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) sued photographer David Slater on behalf of a monkey named "Naruto.". In a recent case filing, PETA and the two individual defendants argue that the family was "negligent in that they did not keep the subject dog restrained and did not keep proper identification or marking of ownership which resulted in the dog being removed at the time" by the defendants. 1125 (a), 15 U.S.C. So instead, I was listed as a co-conspirator, giving PETA the ability to issue a subpoena in order to (try to) seek the names of my confidential informants at PETA, without allowing me to demand documents and depositions of PETA leadership in return. . First, such costs serve as a stand-in for direct publication damages and could severely limit undercover reporting as a result. . A family has settled a lawsuit against People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta) after it took a girl's unattended dog and put it down. However, this does not explain the fact that he listed the dog as a defendant twice.[7]. On March 14, 2005, the circuit court issued a rule to show cause in PETA II stating "that an order of this Court was apparently violated." The rule directed Porter and Petrosinelli to "show cause why they should not be held in contempt for violating this Court's orders of January 21, 2005, April 16, 2004 and December 9, 2004." Animal activists filed another lawsuit against the Miami Seaquarium Monday. Slater insisted that he owned the copyright and not Naruto. Like the undercover work of Upton Sinclair, Daleidens sting videos drew Americans attention to an important truth: the tiny human bodies that are the key byproduct of abortion. PETA (People Eating Tasty Animals People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) is an American animal rights organization and vegan cult. He enjoys Indian food, board games, and talking ceaselessly about politics, religion, and culture. For whatever reason, you are now asking the question: Why should animals have rights? READ MORE, Ingrid E. Newkirk, PETA President and co-author of Animalkind. The group spent tens of thousands of dollars to buy a full-page ad in the New York Times in June 2005 publicizing the videos. . Court Case Against SeaWorld. filed a lawsuit on behalf of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) against the Tri-County Council for the Lower Eastern Shore of Maryland and its public transit division, Shore Transit. PETA has announced that it has settled its copyright lawsuit against photographer David Slater over his iconic "monkey selfie," a self-portrait allegedly taken by a macaque named Naruto. In March 2019, Ryan Magers sued the Alabama Womens Center for Reproductive Alternatives in Huntsville, Alabama, for aborting his unborn child. Offended? Despite stemming from 2011, the case regarding the copyright of a photo technically taken by a monkey is not over yet. Mrs. Shea got Mr. Dillio and Jimmy arrested and taken to court. Read about more off-the-wall court cases on 10 Of The Worlds Most Ridiculous Lawsuits and 10 Silliest Lawsuits Ever Heard In Court. Immediately, PETA went to a Louisiana court and obtained a temporary restraining order against the procedure. A judge can appoint a special prosecutor to try the case, which is what PETA is asking for in its court filings. Vercher was charged with neglect of an animal and paid for the horses treatment. Two women affiliated with PETA, Victoria Carey and Jennifer Wood, travelled to Accomack, Virginia, because they said a mobile home park owner asked for help capturing wild dogs and feral cats. As fate would have it, on the way to court in the case, my wife and I found a little dog who had been hit by a car, bleeding in the gutter. In fact, the majority thought that Cetacean v. Bush was wrongly decided because it didnt go far enough in barring PETA-style lawsuits. The circuit court concluded that because the website may have confused users who wanted to buy items from the actual PETA website, it was "connected" to commerce even though Doughney did not sell any goods or services. Free speech battles can make strange bedfellows. But most of all, I want to thank my wife, Jennifer, who reminded me as I faced the specter of incarceration for refusing to allow my informants to be put at risk of retribution by PETA that we all have a duty to honor the sacrifices made by generations before us by likewise defending the freedoms they fought for. The suit alleged PETA has a broad policy of euthanizing animals, including healthy ones, because it considers pet ownership to be a form of involuntary bondage. Text United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010), aff'd, 533 F.3d 218 (3d Cir. Carr sued for $50,000 in damages. Legal circles are abuzz with the news, and scholars have expressed support for the case. The horse itself did not file the lawsuit, though. The family had sought up to $7 million. The rate fueled the familys lawsuit, which PETA claimed was driven by no kill activists. The unnamed ex called the police after spotting Jones leaving her home. I want to thank Joshua Koltun, my attorney and more importantly, warrior for the First Amendment. In ruling against Daleiden, the district court relied extensively on its assertion that the CMP Videos contain no evidence of actual criminal wrongdoing. That not only is incorrect on its own merits but also employs the wrong test. In 2018, 66-year-old Joseph Carr of Oregon sued a police dog named Rolo and its handler, Deputy Jason Bernards of the Marion County Sheriffs Office, because Rolo bit him. 1125 (d) People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Doughney, 263 F.3d 359 (4th Cir. At least 39,276 animals so far have fallen victim to PETA, many of them young, healthy, and adoptable.